Gold – setting up for a crash?

Crystaline Gold

Image via Wikipedia

Why not? In fact, anything remains possible in financial markets.

Whether gold is resembling a mania or bubble is subjective. Heck, gold could probably double and double again! In the tech stock mania of 1999, We witnessed certain stocks rise 10 fold in under 2 years while gold has only tripled in 5 years. Finance historians have said that one requisite of a mania is to have the asset made easily available to the masses. Well, I haven’t researched whether this is the case today, but I have read about gold dispensing ATM’s have appeared in Europe, North America and the Middle East.

I find it quite comical that when gold rises, zealots dismiss any criticism of their beloved gold by wheeling out their citation of it being a store of value. Who decided that gold is the store of value?

What about silver, tin, sugar or coconut oil as a”store of value”? They too have also tripled in price in the past 5 years?

Between 1981 and 2005, we saw a period of massive asset price inflation and gold traded between $220 and $520 an ounce. It was a very poor store of value for that 24 year period.

I think it’s important to question if gold has become a financial asset that is now a speculative instrument.

I’d also like to challenge the growing movement that gold is an alternative currency. I would like readers to shave a sliver of gold from their hoarded ingots and pay for a coffee, restaurant bill or their car insurance premium! Seriously – when you next sell your family home, don’t put a dollar figure on it – just request that the selling price is 450 ounces of gold. Let’s see how your property conveyancer settles that against the bank’s mortgage?

However, I do marvel at predictions of various targets set by pundits. I ask myself how do they come to such a figure?

As gold doesn’t produce cash flow or have an operating profit, I wonder how these “analyst’s” can value it’s worth? Gold bugs often rebut this statement by talking about Indian jewellery demand, waning mine development and slowing supply.

I’m just not convinced.

If gold is not coming close to a crash, a notable correction would be a healthy. I have posed the question to various folk that gold could halve and they’re answer is overwhelmingly – “It’s not possible”.

Amongst the stories that I now hear and read include Inexperienced investors exhibiting interest in buying gold, Bar room stories of  how “they” bought gold years ago, Affirmations that gold will be the only thing that will keep its value when the world ends and the front page of the business section of a national newspaper features a story claiming it was easy for the featured executive to have made money by investing in gold.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/companies/defensive-strategy-turns-to-gold-for-gattung/story-fn91v9q3-1226118429451

To boot, new gold ETF’s are being created almost weekly, the commodity futures regulators are increasing margins to kerb speculation and gold is within $30 of (the more precious) the price of platinum. The spread between these two metals has averaged ~ $400 for the past 30 years.

Recent moves in the U.S. bond market are telling me that “hard asset” deflation should be investors bigger concern, rather than inflation. Albeit, I believe we will see continued food and energy price inflation. More on this topic is a forthcoming post.

Finally, I believe that there is no such thing as a forced buyer, yet with gold, I think many are acting either in a manner that they feel “forced” or worse still; that they are about to miss-out.

Money is made of cotton

Once Valledupar's main economic produce; Cotton

Image via Wikipedia

Did you know that U.S. paper currency paper is composed of 75% cotton (and 25% linen)?

Each note (depending on its denomination) has a life expectancy of between 2 and 6 years.

The U.S. Mint prints approx. 38 million paper notes per day. Annually, the weight of this money would equal 28 million pounds (or 12.7 million kilograms or the weight of seventy-four Boeing 747 airplanes).

Proportionately, cotton should account for 21 million pounds of this weight which is less than 0.5% of the annual U.S. cotton production alone.

More practically, approx. 55 trillion pounds of cotton is produced around the world globally. India and China are the two largest producers accounting for nearly 60% of this crop.

Some of the supply and demand story includes: cotton’s demand increases when developing countries grow richer (and most of these nations are in tropical climates), India and Pakistan are 2 of the world’s top 4 producers (where political tensions are on the rise) and it’s water intensive.

The price of cotton spent most of the past 30 years trading between 50 cents & $1 per pound, however commencing mid-2009 up to April 2011, the price rose from 60 cents to above $2 per pound.

In the past 3 months, the price of cotton has halved to US$1.03 per pound.

Australia’s inverted yield curve makes America a fertile investing habitat

Today, Australia’s 10 year government bond yield fell below the Reserve Bank’s overnight cash rate for the 1st time since early 2009.

Historically, an inverted yield curve is correlated with moderating inflation, weakening economic activity and possibly suggesting signs of an economic downturn.

Could this precede the official call of a recession? I think the implications are still not fully accepted, meaning Australia remains in denial, for China will apparently save us.

Although I’m bullish on China and commodities, there are phenomenons called “cycles”. Prices do revert to their mean and the Australian Dollar can fall.

Global investors could do well to sell (high) their strong AUD, CHF, JPY or EUR and buy (low) the weaker, cheaper USD.

To enter the world of folly, this could be a turning point for the U.S. Dollar and its rise would have various implications on assets ranging from the Swiss Franc to commodity prices.

Forget the U.S. government’s woes. I prefer to treat the U.S. government and its bonds, if you will; similar to the equity or debt of any other U.S. company. I consider the equity and debt of McDonald’s Corporation is more creditworthy than that of the U.S. government.

Furthermore, investors with USD are searching for returns (as cash currently earns zero) and with a S&P 500 PE of 12 thus giving it an earnings yield of 8%, this is a nice “pick-up” of 5% over the U.S. government 10 year bond….

Finding opportunities amongst the Greek debt noise

I have found that watching debt markets can help you assess opportunities & risks in equities.
For example, let’s look at the yield of Greek debt.
Forget the 14& yield on the 10 yr debt, Greek 2yr debt is yielding 25%.
Irish and Portuguese 2 year debt is 13%.
Spanish and Italian 2 yr debt is barely giving investors 4%, which incidentally are the debt markets to watch.
25% is a big difference between 13% – it easily tells you Greece is not in the clear even though there is a proposed 2nd EU rescue package. In fact, if govn’t debt is yielding 25% – it should default. The wording in the recent ‘draft proposal’ can be paraphrased as a “technical debt”.
Europe’s back-stop will remain in place as long as it can, but I can’t (at this stage, whilst still analysing the particulars) easily accept the EU “put” in the same manner as the “Bernanke put” that started a rally in U.S. equity markets in August 2010.
If the “EU put” is so steadfast, then “back-up the truck” and buy the heck out of Greek debt? Geez – 25% return in 2 years…
Keep in mind that the Euro Zone still has 17 member states with 17 different national governments. This is the simple reason why they’ll have a tougher task than the United States legislators in coming to conclusions.
Equity opportunities may be found in companies that suffer from broader EU “down-drafts” but reside and are domiciled outside the Euro Zone in countries such as Switzerland, Denmark, England, Norway and Sweden.

Is News Corp this year’s BP?

The politicians are after them, the public despises them and any reference about News Corp’s activities comes with the preface, “Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp………..”.

When an oil rig exploded and sunk last year in the Gulf of Mexico, BP and Transocean’s stock prices fell 50%.

I thought News Corp stock was already cheap and we like buying bargains.

So far, News Corp’s stock price has fallen 20% and may keep falling for another week or three but there should be a moment when the stock price’s decline has discounted the fiscal damage that this scandal along with the possibility of News not buying 100% of BSkyB, may equate to.

Just like BP, analysing this opportunity doesn’t have to be difficult.

If you believe that the world of business and politics is about being “fair and equitable”, then don’t read any further.

News Corp employs 50,000 people, is a huge political donor and Prince Alwaleed owns 7% of the company.

The Murdoch family owns nearly 12% of it and control over 38% of the voting stock. That’s a big stake, to not exert influence or favours.

Heard around the traps…

1) When assets are being priced on macro concerns, it’s time to look at the micro (i.e. individual stocks)

2) When the majority are looking from the “top down”, start looking from the ‘bottom up”.

3) “The world seldom ends when everyone is telling me so. When many start becoming short sellers, it may actually be a buy signal”.

Aquaculture – An alternative to feeding the world

On a recent plane trip, I was seated next to a veterinary undergraduate student named John.

On the flight, John was consumed with specific reading about the feed to protein conversion ratio of fish, when compared to other sources of animal protein.

He explained to me the science behind how many kilograms of grain or feed an animal needs to consume in order to convert it into a kilogram of live weight or protein flesh.

The feed conversion ratio (FCR) is a measure of an animals efficiency in converting feed mass into increased body mass.

Sheep and cattle require 7kg-8kg of feed to put on 1kg of live weight. Pigs have an FCR of 3.5. Poultry has an average FCR of 3 while Atlantic Salmon is 1.2 and other mass farmed fish such as Tilapia is around 1.7.

Currently, there are a few listed fish farming businesses around the world with the Nordic countries leading the way.

The agriculture theme ranges far and wide but it seems that aquaculture fades into the background. We all can understand the food supply and demand story coupled with yearning for protein as developing countries become richer. I am interested in exploring a cost effective, low cost method of producing protein sources other than soy, not to mention the Omega-3 health benefits.

 

 

Inefficient markets offering opportunity in gold equities?

Currently, it seems investors are “throwing away” their shares of selected gold “explorers”, without any consideration that perhaps owning the equity in these companies, when considering the value of their reserves of gold (accounting for various costs) is cheaper than buying bullion itself.

When owning equity in gold companies, I understand there are pro’s and con’s of operational leverage versus failure and the results of decisions made by management, however it’s often advisable for a junior explorer to leave the gold in the ground rather than spend money to become a “producer”, in order to “extract” the value.

The world wants a lower AUD before buying up Australia

In Australian equities, the occurrence of planned joint ventures, mergers and takeovers being re-considered or aborted and profit downgrades by companies and analysts are increasingly being associated with the strength in the Australian Dollar.

The opportunity will lie when and as these equity prices fall coupled with a correction in the AUD, that then, on a global basis, Australian equities and other assets will be “on sale”.

Accepting a loss is tough

A prospective client once asked me if I had lost money while investing or trading?. The answer is an obvious “yes”.

I have learnt that the greatest of investors and traders spend proportionately more time understanding the risk to their money versus amount they will make.

If their view about an investment changes, they easily cut their loss or reduce their exposure. They don’t feel that an asset “owes” them a certain price; let alone an obligation or privilege to “break-even”.

They don’t have an aversion to taking a loss.

Whether it’s a bad investment or a romantic relationship that didn’t spark, accepting the loss is an important step to take before “moving on”.