This is not a celebratory post but intended to highlight the practice of observing prices and moods when they reach an extreme.
There are times when experience tells you that things are stretched, feeling “dangerous” or perhaps resembling mania, frenzy or euphoria.
(see my recent posts warning of such)
I still wonder what makes people chase assets at “stretched” prices.
Are they trying to “eek” out the last 10% of a move?
Are they oblivious that the “fat part” of the trade has been seen and had?
Do they understand what their risk/reward ratio looks like?
Today’s example is the price action in Gold.
Yesterday (overnight) Gold fells $130 per ounce of ~ 6.3%. It’s trading at $1,915 as I write this. Incidentally, Silver plummeted 17%.
It’s difficult (impossible, even) to pinpoint the timing of such a move, but it should be easier to understand when not to chase something at perpetually higher prices without having a sound reasoning for doing so.
Today, prices of Aussie gold companies are 7% lower and the poor sod who bought Saracen Minerals (SAR:ASX) 2 weeks ago at $6.75 is wearing 20% worth of pain.
Furthermore, these stocks are now trading at the same prices seen 6 weeks ago.
Wasn’t gold hitting new highs only 4 days ago?
August 12, 2020
by Rob Zdravevski
rob@karriasset.com.au
Below is a “weekly” 35 year chart of Gold and its rolling 200 day moving average.
At selected peaks, I have added the percentage that the Gold price was trading above its “weekly” 200 day moving average.
Incidentally, each move where percentages are listed coincided with a 3 standard deviation above its mean.
Today it makes for a marginal “even money” bet.
Let’s say that Gold extends itself to 80% above the 200 dma, thus taking it to $2,466 OR it decides to move lower to visit the “weekly” 200 dma of $1,370…..
So from today’s price, it’s either $530 per ounce upwards or $570 per to the downside.
Mean reversion does have its own gravitational pull.
August 20, 2020
by Rob Zdravevski
rob@karriasset.com.au