The pay cheque matters more than your brand

A news tidbit from the Australian labour front appeared in The Australian newspaper on Oct 7, 2011, raised my interest.

The story said…..

“Kevin Reynolds, the head of Western Australia’s Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union, yesterday described large resource-sector companies in the state as “bottom-feeding freeloaders who suck up labour trained by other people without contributing a cent”.  Mr Reynold’s call for the major resource firms to contribute to the state’s construction industry training fund was backed by home builder ABN Group’s Dale Alcock.”

I haven’t formed a distinct view on this statement or topic yet, however the one thing I have noticed increasingly, whether its the mining industry or financial services, employees over the past 10-15 years are working simply for the pay cheque more than ever!

Company or even career loyalty is not as common as I once remember. All you need to do is look at the employment history of people on LinkedIn. It is difficult to find tenures lasting longer than 18 months in some profiles. An employee’s clear intent on using your company and knowledge as a “step-ladder” towards something else is possibly putting employers offside.

Whether companies need to increase investment in “human capital” more than equipment or projects is probably a complicated question to answer.

When I started in the stockbroking business nearly 20 years ago, all I wanted to do was work as a stockbroker. I wanted to work for one of the big Wall Street firms.

Once upon a time, employees worked for what the company believed in, rather than solely for the pay cheque and puffing up their resumes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: