Big Declines in Coffee, Cocoa, Cotton & Sugar.

Since their 2011 highs, Coffee & Sugar prices have fallen 43%, Cocoa has declined 37%, Orange Juice Concentrate is 48% lower and Cotton prices have retreated 62%.

Obviously it’s now cheaper to buy these commodities than it was last year and some are even hitting the same levels seen 10 years ago.

I’m always interested investigating how far the pendulum has swung when I see such price moves when compared to the changes in the supply and demand story. Although seasonal changes have great effect, I still remain bullish on the direction of prices of commodity prices, especially the soft and grain commodities. An old blog post that I wrote about Cotton may be interesting for readers to re-visit.

The FINVIZ website is also a wonderful resource where you can quickly check the prices and retrieve charts on various commodities.

25 Great Truths & Possibly The 5 Best Sentences

GREAT TRUTHS

1. In my many years I have come to a conclusion that one useless man is a shame, two is a law firm and three or more is a congress. —   John Adams

2. If you don’t read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed. —   Mark Twain

3. Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But then I repeat myself. —   Mark Twain

4. I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle. —   Winston Churchill

5. A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul. —   George Bernard Shaw

6. A liberal is someone who feels a great debt to his fellow man, which debt he proposes to pay off with your money. —   G. Gordon Liddy

7. Democracy must be something more than two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner. —   James Bovard , Civil Libertarian (1994)

8. Foreign aid might be defined as a transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries. —   Douglas Casey , Classmate of Bill Clinton at Georgetown University

9. Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys. —   P.J. O’Rourke , Civil Libertarian

10. Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. —   Frederic Bastiat , French economist(1801-1850)

11. Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. —   Ronald Reagan   (1986)

12. I don’t make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. —   Will Rogers

13. If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free! —   P.J. O’Rourke

14. In general, the art of government consists of taking as much money as possible from one party of the citizens to give to the other. —   Voltaire   (1764)

15. Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn’t mean politics won’t take an interest in you! —   Pericles   (430 B.C.)

16. No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session. —   Mark Twain   (1866)

17. Talk is cheap…except when Congress does it. —   Anonymous

18. The government is like a baby’s alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other. —   Ronald Reagan

19. The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. —   Winston Churchill

20. The only difference between a tax man and a taxidermist is that the taxidermist leaves the skin. — Mark Twain

21. The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. —   Herbert Spencer , English Philosopher (1820-1903)

22. There is no distinctly Native American criminal class…save Congress. —   Mark Twain

23. What this country needs are more unemployed politicians. —   Edward Langley , Artist (1928-1995)

24. A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have. —   Thomas Jefferson

25. We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office. —   Aesop

FIVE BEST SENTENCES

1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity, by legislating the wealth out of prosperity.

2. What one person receives without working for…another person must work for without receiving.

3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.

4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work, because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation!

Government & Corporate Unfunded Pensions

In a recent interview with Charlie Rose, Chicago Mayor, Rahm Emanuel was asked to list the greatest challenge that lies ahead for his city, to which Emanuel replied, “addressing the pension deficit”.

U.S. city, municipal and state governments are massive employers and yet their workers don’t have pensions that are funded and ready for their retirement.

The theme surrounding the funding, reforming and creating pensions is currently one of my favourite topics of research.

In this post, I wanted to discuss some points that concern me about underfunded pensions.

Just to start, consider the social and financial effect that will involve millions of employees not having enough money to retire on. If cities continue to run high budget deficits and unfunded pension schemes, it will be difficult to recruit firefighters, police and health professionals.

Government can reduce their pension liabilities by increasing their revenues (higher property taxes, parking costs), cutting costs (less or infrequent services, fewer employees) or selling assets (infrastructure such as freeways, power stations or airports).

These pension deficits also exist amongst U.S. companies. But they are better at hiding it.

Over the past year, American corporations have bragged about the robustness of their balance sheets. They are quick to tell investors how they’ve restructured their affairs, sold off unwanted businesses, trimmed costs and grew their earnings.

Although, much of the earnings growth has been a function of cost cutting and not revenue growth, which is another story all together.

Amongst this self promotion, I noticed stories that proclaimed how certain companies have billions of dollars in “net cash” held on their balance sheet.

An example might look like something like, Company ‘A’ has a market capitalisation of $20 billion. It has total (long and short-term) debt of $2 billion whilst its cash or equivalent securities amounts to $4 billion, thus they have a “net cash” position of $2 billion. All of this looks OK until you discover they have an unfunded pension liability of $7 billion, which amounts to one-third of its market cap.

It is annoying that items such as goodwill and deferred tax benefits appear so clearly in a company’s list of assets (correctly, pension assets do not belong the company), but you need to dig deeper in order to find what their total obligations are.

Could inheritance tax make a comeback?

Retirement and baby boomers continue to be a large growth demographic for the legal and financial industry, but I think retirees are becoming disenchanted about the various pieces of advice that they are receiving.

My experiences of Estate Planning have often involved either buying life/trauma insurance and establishing a will, while family trusts are used for tax minimisation and the distribution of income.

Although many retirees have an attitude towards their wealth of either, “It’s no use to you when you’re dead” or “That you can’t take it with you”, they do feel concerned what happens to the money after they have died.

Yet, it seems that even the best estate plans still end up in arguments and disputes.

Bickering over estate assets may be curtailed if estate planning advice extends beyond the selling of insurances or pre-paid funeral packages.

One aspect of estate planning that I don’t hear being discussed is “asset protection”.

When I think of the phrase “asset protection’, it’s often based around protecting your wealth from creditors and soured family, personal or business relationships. In other countries, asset protection also involves planning for inheritance tax.

Maybe a company, a family trust or my pension fund should own more of my assets. After all, these entities “keep on living” after I have passed away.

Planning for taxes?

Australia abolished inheritance tax (sometimes called death or estate duties) in 1979. Some readers will have experiences of how devastating this tax was on their family wealth.

We are now heading into a period of a massive transfer of generational wealth. At the same time governments are now looking to distribute wealth “wider and more evenly”, while also searching for more revenue.

Australians should at least prepare for a possible return of estate taxes.

The rising cost of capital

I wanted to expand on a previous post from Jan 18, 2012 titled “What if interest rates double”. https://robzdravevski.com/2012/01/18/what-if-interest-rates-double/

What if the cost of capital doubles or triples within 10 years?

I don’t think this outcome is far-fetched and I do think it is worth considering or at least being prepared for.

In the U.S., the Prime rate is currently 3.25%, a 15 year fixed mortgage costs 3.4% per annum and the government 10 year bond is yielding 2.2%. Australians pay 6.5% for a 3 year fixed home loan while the Reserve Bank of Australia’s Cash Rate is presently 4.25%.

Whether it’s the mortgage, government or capital markets, rising rates in the coming decade shouldn’t be a surprise. After all, they are at the extreme low of their historical ranges.

Continued cheap credit isn’t something we should wish for. Take a look at Japan. Deflation is the larger evil.

Presently, central banks are trying to reflate economies and the result of the increasing monetary base should be inflation. How high it will rise will depend on the policy employed to curb it from becoming hyper-inflationary. One strategy that will be used will involve raising rates in order to slow a recovering and expanding economy.

We should remember that rate cuts are used to stimulate activity. Keeping rates low for a prolonged period tell us either how sick an economy is or how much of a “jump-start” the economy ultimately needs.

I think that rising rates should be (quietly) celebrated as they signal an expanding economy. The rising cost of credit is designed to temper the growth or least keep it at a measured pace.

Rates will rise noticeably in the next 10 years from the combined results involving policy, creditworthiness, lending criteria and the flow of money.

Although economies should improve, the inflationary effects of central bank “money printing” and the legacy of company and government bond defaults will be the greater influence towards the cost of credit rising.

Scarcity of capital will be the second wave of upward pressure on interest rates. Banks will be required to hold greater liquidity and their lending criteria will remain tough but more importantly I believe money will flow increasingly from the developed world towards emerging markets, where the return on the capital invested will be a more attractive proposition to lenders.

This exodus of capital will cause interest rates in the developed world to move higher. It’s quite possible that the rise will be amplified by erroneous central bank policy because they deem higher rates are justified in order to stifle the inflationary result from their actions earlier in the decade.

These higher rates will also be used (and justified) in order to court capital back to safer investing jurisdictions.

The ramifications of this scenario would have far-reaching effects on their portfolios and I feel it is an important theme in which investors will need to prepare and position for.

In an upcoming post, I will apply this theme to how I think it will affect commodity prices and mining companies.

Cash is expensive

Whether it’s property, equities, bonds, jewellery, art or even rare coins – there is often an opinion forthcoming whether it’s consider to be cheap, fairly valued or expensive..

Cash seems to miss out on falling into these categories. Cash is referred to as “king” in times of worry and “lazy” when everything is booming. You’re can be either “cash rich”, “cash poor”, “cashed-up”, “strapped for cash” or it can be “burning a hole in your pocket”.

The cost of money can be cheap or expensive when you are borrowing it but why can’t cash be expensive or cheap when valuing it as an investment?

Today, I think cash is expensive!

Notwithstanding the ebbs and flows of investment markets in the near-term, when compared to other asset classes, it’s probably very expensive.

The Earnings Yield

When scanning for what I refer to as a “Fertile Investing Habitat”, I take the Earnings Yield of an equity  index (which is the inverse of the Price/Earnings Ratio) and compare it to the government 10 year bond yield and the interest earned on bank cash deposits in that particular country when trying to initially determine whether that “habitat” is potentially cheap.

For example, the P/E ratio estimate for the current fiscal year of the ASX 200 Index is 12, the inverse of this figure and thus its earnings yield is 8.3%. The yield for the Australian government  10 year bond is 4% and a generous at-call bank deposit would earn 5%.

From this I may deduce that the ASX 200 equity index might offer a better return proposition over nest few years versus the return prospects of cash?

To figure out if my investment in cash is actually expensive, simply invert the 5% bank deposit interest and your conclusion is a Price/Earnings (P/E) Ratio of 25. This is twice as expensive as the ASX 200 equity index!

What about the United States?

The S&P 500 has a P/E of 12.5 which equals an earnings yield of 8%. The 10 year govn’t bond’s yield to maturity is 2.1% (P/E of 47) and the Fed Fund rate is 0.25%, giving you a P/E of 400.

What if interest rates double?

Over the past few months I have been asked whether the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) will lower interest rates by 25 basis points in the coming months.

My answer: Who cares?

With a RBA cash rate so low, does it matter that much if we see a rate cut of 25 basis points? Oh sorry, it might save borrowers $25 more per month. If your hoping for such a rate cut to save you $300 per year, perhaps you are too leveraged in the first place and didn’t do anything about it over the past three years?

The real damage will be done if rates were to double or triple over the next 8-12 years, of which I am placing a greater probability towards occurring.

The Australian inflation rate was last reported as 3.5% and the RBA’s “Cash Rate” is 4.25%, which equals a real interest rate of 0.75%.

Investors in Australia, today, need to re-educate themselves about the differences between a nominal interest rate and a real interest rate.

Earning 4.8% at-call in the bank, isn’t REALLY maintaining your purchasing power when you include the inflation rate, let alone adjusting for taxes!

What if……due to various global capital forces, the real interest rate rose 1.5%, which would be closer a 30 year average and when combining my view of prolonged energy and food inflation AND the economic effect of expanded money circulation, inflation rates could themselves rise a further 2%.

Hey presto! You would then have an inflation rate of 5.5% plus a real rate of 2.25% for a nominal rate total of 7.75%.

Add the spread that a lending bank would charge and you are suddenly borrowing money at 10.2%!!!

The 1970’s thesis continued – Fashion and Politics

I’m no fashionista but to continue a previous blog where I discussed an analogy covering the 1970’s, I am now seeing bellbottom jeans making a comeback to the stores along with specifically poorly styled shorts, slim tiny skateboards and even tennis-type sun visors.

So, if the current stock market, economic, social and union situation mimics the early 70’s, it won’t be too long before tartan (Bay City Rollers, remember them?) and crocheted bikini’s soon appear. It’s all quite worrying but at least there was Farrah!

Politically, the early 70’s saw an American 2-term President Nixon give way (albeit resigning due to scandal) to a succession of 1-termers in Ford & Carter. “Stability” in policy returned when Reagan took office in 1981.

In the United Kingdom, Harold Wilson’s two-term rule came to an end in 1970 and was followed by single election winners in Edward Heath (conservative) who lost after calling an early election in reaction to striking miners to see Labour’s Wilson return for a shortened term followed James Callaghan’s tenure. Then in 1979, Thatcher took over.

Australia’s government didn’t have any more luck with stability nor scandal.

Liberal PM, John Gorton was deposed mid-term by Billy McMahon who was defeated at election after serving 20 months. In 1972, Whitlam’s (Labor) government was elected with a 9 seat house majority (but didn’t control the senate) and following the ’74 election he lost a further 5 seats in the House of Representatives.

He did also have his share of drama aided by Minerals and Energy minister, Rex Connor who wanted to control the mining industry.

Although installed into office by the Governor-General, Malcolm Fraser’s (Liberal) 7 years as Prime Minister (until 1983) morphed into the relative sensible Hawke/Keating years.

It didn’t seem to matter which political party was in power, the requisite for social and economic happiness was stability in government and a majority in the house.

History does’t seem to bode well for Gillard and Obama!

Be careful what you wish for

When emotions such as anger, disgust and frustration infiltrate the collective sentiment of the population, consensus “group-think” doesn’t provide the sensible, safe answer or result that it might be traditionally assumed.

2010 10 30 - 9442 - Washington DC - Fear-Sanit...

Image by thisisbossi via Flickr

The protests that are occurring around the world are rebellions to the status quo. However when the anger of belligerent protestors is countered with violent reactions by authorities, the decisions being made don’t seem to have the desired effect.
Politically, I think the outcomes that protestors are hoping for, will not turn out how they dreamed.
Whether it’s Mubarak, Putin, Sarkozy, Gillard or Merkel, perhaps it may be the case of better the devil you know.
I anticipate weakness in the U.S. stock market throughout 2012 with a clearer downtrend commencing from the March/April timeframe and lasting into late October.
By the time November 2012 comes around, Obama will stand little chance of being re-elected but a Republican President won’t prove to be any better and may be a worse outcome for the next 4 years.
Under this scenario, governments still won’t find the ability to plan beyond the next 18 months, for soon after, they’ll be back on the campaign trail for the next election.
China’s ability to have rolling 5-year plans should be envy of policy makers everywhere.

An “early call” to sell Gold – Aussie Dollar is the key

Extract from my November 16th, 2011 newsletter

The Trade: 

Short Sell Gold on break below ~ $1,760 spot price.

Stop at $1,806 or $1,796 (to be determined/refined)

BUT the key to watch is AUD breaking below 1.0050.

Today’s fall in the EUR below 1.3480 along with declines in Copper, Silver and Platinum are providing early and minor confirmations for the Short Gold trade.

Further confirmation of market weakness, especially in equities would be confirmed if the SPX broke below 1,226.

If (once) gold’s decline commences, we’d look for it to test and break levels such as $1,630, $1,540 and $1,450 onto its way down to $1,340.

At a premium to Platinum..

Gold continues to trade at a premium to its more expensive cousin, Platinum. The spread between the two hasn’t been this wide for at least 30 years.

For past 20 years, the price of platinum has traded at an average of $250 higher than gold while the past 10 years has seen it trade at a mean of $405 above gold.

Today, gold is $145 higher that platinum. This is $550 “off” the 10 year average and a $300 deviation from its 3 year average.